i watched this moon-landing-was-a-hoax program on british tv the other day and it was so convincing that i was surfing the web right after it was over to find some reasonable explanations for the seemingly valid points they made…the partial cross-hairs and common backdrop in photos, lack of dust on lander, odd lighting as if from another source besides sun, why astronauts suffered no radiation poisoning, angles of shadows, etc. they really had me going, but then i found this site to ease my mind. just goes to show you how you can convince somebody of just about anything if you show only one side of an argument. kinda like how that leonard nimoy series(name?) had lots of people believing in big foot.