gay “marriage” is bullshit in my opinion and i’m opposed to it. marriage is defined as the union of a man and a woman. period. full stop. why must we go and redefine standards for the sake of a cultural minority? give them their civil unions with their benefits, but why desecrate the sanctity of marriage. next thing you know, california will redefine the definition of child molestation so wacko jacko can keep doing it. and maybe some crazy state will redefine what sex is and elect bubba their governor. massachusetts is liable to elect a gay bishop or something(oh, wait a minute). dubya seems to be the only guy not talkin out the side of his neck on this one. who knows though, this whole decision may backfire on them:

…But the most important consequence of Goodridge may be that the country will now get the honest debate on the gay-marriage issue that the media has managed to suppress up to now. Gay marriage has arrived in Massachusetts at a point when the larger public is opposed to the reform. What’s more, three quarters of the states and the federal government have put laws or constitutional amendments in place that define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Once it becomes apparent (and it will) that a judicial decision in a single and notably liberal state threatens to sweep all of those laws aside and impose gay marriage on an unwilling nation, all hell is going to break loose. The conflict between public opinion and high-handed judicial and media elites is about to be exposed with unprecedented clarity.

0 Responses to “”


  • No Comments

Leave a Reply